This is definitely one of the movies that has lowered in
esteem for me upon second viewing. The music was better than I remember it
being, in fact I loved it, and I thought a couple of the characters
(specifically the alligator and the little firefly) were HILARIOUS. However,
the movie’s biggest crime was the extreme underdevelopment of the characters. This
underdevelopment was present specifically with three characters, Tiana, Naveen,
and Dr. Facilier.
It is no shock that in a 90 minute movie, a few characters
are going to be pretty flat. Characters like Charlotte La Bouff I would never
expect to undergo any major developments. That’s why when she is just her
hilarious, spoiled self the entire movie I love her. But those three characters
mentioned above were the main characters and I would typically expect to become
more invested in them than I did. I left the movie with the same defining
characteristic of each character as I left.
Tiana was an extremely flat, albeit likeable, character. In
fact, she was a fantastic princess. She is one of the only major characters Disney
has given us who “had her priorities in check.” She is extremely independent
and hard working, and in constant pursuit of her goals. However, the audience
was really left with only one impression of Tiana – she is hardworking. That
was consistently presented as her predominant personality trait, with another
one not really overtaking it throughout the film, so that is why another
extremely flat character, Naveen, presented the biggest issue for me.
I really disliked him. He was beautiful, had a harming accent, and had some
funny moments, but the filmmakers gave me no justification as to why Tiana all
of a sudden fell in love with him. He starts the movie as a philanderer and
spoiled prince and pretty much constantly drops lines that reminds the audience
of this status until all of a sudden he wants to propose to Tiana?! We saw no
reason for why their personalities would ever click other than that they were
in close quarters for an extended period of time. Which, though probably works
in real life, doesn’t seem like a good enough justification for a movie romance.
Because Tiana is presented as SUCH a good catch, it doesn’t really line up that
she would go for a guy like Naveen.
The third flat character was Dr. Facilier. He was super
entertaining. However, I felt that, compared to other villains in the Disney
sphere, he just didn’t seem that evil.
Sure, he has “friends on the other side,” but his death at the end seemed to be
pretty harsh considering all he really seemed to do was turn Naveen into a
frog. And, because Naveen was, frankly, so dislikeable, his transformation didn’t
hurt me as much as Tiana’s (which wasn’t even Dr. Facilier’s fault!). We never
really got an explanation as to why Dr. Facilier wanted money, and I just felt
that he was an extremely underdeveloped villain as he didn’t come across as
that villainous at all.
Overall, The Princess and the Frog has some hilarious
moments and excellent music. The princess is probably also one of the most
relatable, beautiful, and likeable characters because the only quality she is
defined with is her diligence. But her flatness seems to be a complete mismatch
with the flatness given to us in the prince’s character. And the villain was
just not evil enough for me to feel justified by his death or to be super
invested in Naveen and Tiana’s escape.
No comments:
Post a Comment